Is it ethical to use animals in psychological research

Terms Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and publish your likes in the future.By the end of the study in 1972, only 74 of the test subjects were alive. 28 of the original 399 men had died of syphilis, 100 were dead of related complications, 40 of their wives had been infected, and 19 of their children were born with congenital syphilis.Herzog (1988) showed that the verdicts being made regarding moral responsibilities to other species are often fickle and contradictory.The code also discusses the use of animals in behavioral research,.From 1950 through 1953, the U.S. Army sprayed chemicals over six cities in the United States and Canada, in order to test dispersal patterns of chemical weapons.Alternatives to the Use of Animals in Psychological Research. Author. Gallup, Gordon G. Suarez,. Bioethics Research Library of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics.

ETHICAL PRINCIPLES OF PSYCHOLOGISTS

Should humans use animals for psychological research

However this could be due to the fact that a rat would be killed quickly by way of poison as apposed to the percieved sufferering in laboritories.I agree that the use of animal testing does benefit a lot of psychological research, but it appears that animal research does not get the recognition it deserves.Much information about these programs was classified and kept secret.The use of animals in research and teaching is a subject that.Proposed Alternatives Plants lack a nervous system and therefore cannot be used to learn about psychological phenomena.Animal research has developed methods to recuperate function in moderately paralyzed limbs and to treat high blood pressure and migraines.

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.Whilst it could be argued that these studies could be considered to be using animals unfairly, it must be noted that their results lead the way for further research into many aspects of human behaviour.US Army Activities in the US Biological Warfare Program, 1977 Congressional report.Yet the animals are not aware of their right to withdraw, which is a key piece of information that participants in studies should be aware of.

As a lover of animals, I have never fully agreed with the use of testing on them.

History of Animal Experimentation in Psychology

Before even mentioning how valuable its been to the world of psychology the difference that using animals in research have had on medicine is incredible.Researchers have been able to gain a better understanding of how the central nervous system works Protection of the Animals The Animal Welfare Act is in place to govern the care and use of many reteach animals, additionally the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) is to review all research protocol.The convulsion lasted five minutes, and was succeeded by a coma.I think that it is a real shame that a few unethical studies give psychology such a bad name.I found your blog very informative and it presented good for and against arguments.In 1969, Kentucky Court of Appeals Judge Samuel Steinfeld dissented in Strunk v.

Using animals in research for testing is a last resort, however we are biologically similar to many species such as rats and mice and therefore it is sometimes neccessary to use them.Tissue cultures cannot develop depression, alcoholism, autism, learning disorders, memory impairments, aggressive behavior, social abnormalities, or other psychologically relevant problems.Psychologists Use Animals In Psychological. break any ethical guidelines.The CIA leadership had serious concerns about these activities, as evidenced in a 1957 Inspector General Report, which stated.Using animals in psychological research. Therefore animal testing should not easily be written off and with the ethical guidelines of today less harm.

In 1953, the AEC ran several studies at the University of Iowa on the health effects of radioactive iodine in newborns and pregnant women.Operation Big Itch, in 1954, was designed to test munitions loaded with uninfected fleas ( Xenopsylla cheopis ).However, this blog was very informative and seemed to show an importance of no harm coming to the animal being tested on.Franz, et al., The U.S. Biological Warfare and Biological Defense Programs.To conclude if carried out without the regulations put into place, I think animal testing can be horrific and sometimes unnecessary.Animal care and use in research in the United States are largely.Halpern, Sydney A. (2006). Lesser Harms: The Morality of Risk in Medical Research.

In 1952, professional tennis player Harold Blauer died when injected by Dr.Medicine and Slavery: The Diseases and Health Care of Blacks in Antebellum Virginia.During the 1950s the United States conducted a series of field tests using entomological weapons.Another of the MKULTRA subprojects, Operation Midnight Climax, consisted of a web of CIA-run safehouses in San Francisco, Marin, and New York which were established in order to study the effects of LSD on unconsenting individuals.When the needle entered the brain substance, she complained of acute pain in the neck.Hiding the use of animal testing in research only enforces these suggestions and implications as opinions more.Attitudes Toward the Use of Animals in Psychological Research and Education Results From a National Survey of Psychologists S.

ETHICAL ISSUES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH. Use of Animals Researchers must treat animal.Research has found that many chimpanzees can solve problems quicker than a human can blink, and where human children fail to think logically to solve simple tasks, young chimpanzees do not seem to struggle.Regulations and rules for the maintenance and handling of animals have been created by the Federal Animal Welfare Act, these rules are applied through examinations by federal and funding agencies.Monkeys were left without blood flow to their brains for an hour before being resuscitated to see the effects it had on the brain.Especially as much of the animal testing that people oppose comes under medical research, not psychological.It laid out many modern guidelines for ethical medical research.

For the consensual, ethical, and legal use of human beings in medical research, see Human subject research.This experiment attempted to use psychological abuse to induce stuttering in children who spoke normally.

Ethical Issues in Psychology – CSB/SJU

In 1895, New York City pediatrician Henry Heiman intentionally infected two mentally disabled boys—one four-year-old and one sixteen-year-old—with gonorrhea as part of a medical experiment.